1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. ...
  4. 13
  5. 14
  6. 15
  7. 16
  8. 17
  9. 18
  10. 19
  11. 20

CPLRG™ 0018 - Schindler Elevator Corp. v. Otis Elevator Co. - Jan. 15, 2010

Schindler Elevator Corp. v. Otis Elevator Co., 593 F.3d 1275, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 969 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (LINN & Friedman; DYK, concurring in result & dissenting in part)

Schindler01152010

MAJOR ISSUES: Claim construction; prosecution disclaimer. Read CPLRG™ 0018

CPLRG™ 0023 - Wyeth v. Kappos - Jan. 7, 2010

Wyeth v. Kappos, 591 F.3d 136 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (RADER, Plager & Moore)

Wyeth01072010

MAJOR ISSUES: Patent term adjustment; term extension because of PTO failure to meet deadlines (“A delay”) and to issue patent within 3 years of filing (“B delay”); elimination of “overlap”; overlap commencing only after three-year mark; PTO’s erroneous interpretation as greater of A or B Read CPLRG™ 0023

CPLRG™ 0017 - Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. v. Cardiac Science Operating Co. - Jan. 5, 2010

Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. v. Cardiac Science Operating Co. 590 F.3d 1326 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (GAJARSA, Michel & Friedman)

KoninklykePhilips01052010

MAJOR ISSUES: Interference between patent and application; interpretation of claim copied by an applicant from a patent; written description support; PTO Rule 41.200(b) contrary to judicial authority Read CPLRG™ 0017

CPLRG™ 0014 - International Seaway Trading Corp. v. Walgreens Corp. - Dec. 17, 2009

F.3d –, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 27648 (Fed. Cir. 2009) (DYK & Bryson; CLEVENGER, dissenting)

internationalseaway12172009fc

MAJOR ISSUES: Design patents; ordinary observer standard for anticipation and obviousness; minor variations not avoiding anticipation; design as a whole; features visible any time during product’s life

Read CPLRG™ 0014

CPLRG™ 0013 - Intellectual Science & Technology, Inc. v. Sony Electronics., Inc. - Dec. 15, 2009

F.3d—-, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 27330 (Fed. Cir. 2009) (RADER, Archer & Gajarsa)

intellectualscience12152009fc

MAJOR ISSUES: Summary judgment of noninfringement
Expert declaration by patent owner–conclusory statements not sufficient to survive summary judgment motion
Expert conclusory statements on infringement–failure to link to particular structures in accused device
Means-plus-function limitations

Read CPLRG™ 0013

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. ...
  4. 13
  5. 14
  6. 15
  7. 16
  8. 17
  9. 18
  10. 19
  11. 20

©2010 Donald S. Chisum - All Rights Reserved

Website design by Bluegrass Internet Services