Currently Browsing CPLRG™ by: Case Date
Browse By: Case Name | Case Number

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. ...
  4. 10
  5. 11
  6. 12
  7. 13
  8. 14
  9. 15
  10. 16
  11. 17

Jan. 5, 2010 - Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. v. Cardiac Science Operating Co. - CPLRG™ 0017

Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. v. Cardiac Science Operating Co. 590 F.3d 1326 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (GAJARSA, Michel & Friedman)

KoninklykePhilips01052010

MAJOR ISSUES: Interference between patent and application; interpretation of claim copied by an applicant from a patent; written description support; PTO Rule 41.200(b) contrary to judicial authority Read CPLRG™ 0017

Dec. 17, 2009 - International Seaway Trading Corp. v. Walgreens Corp. - CPLRG™ 0014

F.3d –, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 27648 (Fed. Cir. 2009) (DYK & Bryson; CLEVENGER, dissenting)

internationalseaway12172009fc

MAJOR ISSUES: Design patents; ordinary observer standard for anticipation and obviousness; minor variations not avoiding anticipation; design as a whole; features visible any time during product’s life

Read CPLRG™ 0014

Dec. 15, 2009 - Intellectual Science & Technology, Inc. v. Sony Electronics., Inc. - CPLRG™ 0013

F.3d—-, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 27330 (Fed. Cir. 2009) (RADER, Archer & Gajarsa)

intellectualscience12152009fc

MAJOR ISSUES: Summary judgment of noninfringement
Expert declaration by patent owner–conclusory statements not sufficient to survive summary judgment motion
Expert conclusory statements on infringement–failure to link to particular structures in accused device
Means-plus-function limitations

Read CPLRG™ 0013

Dec. 7, 2009 - Tyco Healthcare Group LP v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. - CPLRG™ 0012

587 F.3d 1375, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 26568 (Fed. Cir. 2009) (MICHEL & Prost; NEWMAN, dissenting)

tyco12072009fc

MAJOR ISSUES: Standing to sue–dismissal without prejudice
Agreement transferring patents
Exception for patents and applications “related to” pending litigation

Read CPLRG™ 0012

Dec. 7, 2009 - Source Search Technologies, LLC v. LendingTree, LLC - CPLRG™ 0011

F.3d –, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 26570 (Fed. Cir. 2009) (RADER, Plager & Schall)

sourcesearch12072009fc

MAJOR ISSUES: Obviousness–no summary judgment of invalidity–fact issues on teachings of prior art references
E-commerce system: more than computerized version of pre-internet systems
Infringement–fact issues on accused system
Definiteness–”standardized” not unduly subjective

Read CPLRG™ 0011

Currently Browsing CPLRG™ by: Case Date
Browse By: Case Name | Case Number

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. ...
  4. 10
  5. 11
  6. 12
  7. 13
  8. 14
  9. 15
  10. 16
  11. 17

©2010 Donald S. Chisum - All Rights Reserved

Website design by Bluegrass Internet Services