Currently Browsing CPLRG™ by: Case Name
Browse By: Case Date | Case Number

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. ...
  10. 17

AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. - CPLRG™ 0005 - Sep. 25, 2009

AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., 583 F.3d 766, CPLRG 0005 (Fed. Cir. 2009) astrazenecateva09252009

MAJOR ISSUES: inequitable conduct, no intent to deceive, disclosure of comparative data as requested by examiner to overcome obviousness rejection, failure to disclose internal data on other related compounds, failure to synthesize compounds for comparative testing

Read CPLRG™ 0005

Avid Identification Systems, Inc. v. Crystal Import Corp. - CPLRG™ 0059 - Apr. 27, 2010

Avid Identification Systems, Inc. v. Crystal Import Corp., 603 F.3d 967, CPLRG 0059 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (PROST & Mayer; LINN, concurring-in-part & dissenting-in-part)AvidIdentification04272010

MAJOR ISSUES:  inequitable conduct; individuals subject to duty of candor; person other than inventors, attorneys and agents; substantive involvement in preparation or prosecution of patent application Read CPLRG™ 0059

Bid for Position, LLC v. AOL, LLC - CPLRG™ 0045 - Apr. 7, 2010

Bid for Position, LLC v. AOL, LLC, 601 F.3d 1311 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (BRYSON, Newman & Moore)BidforPosition04072010

MAJOR ISSUES: prosecution history disclaimer; doctrine of equivalents Read CPLRG™ 0045

Bilski v. Kappos - CPLRG™ 0015 - Jun. 28, 2010

Bilski v. Kappos, 130 S. Ct. 3218, CPLRG 0015 (2010) (KENNEDY, Roberts, Thomas, Alito & Scalia (except for Parts II-B-2 and II-C-2), STEVENS, Ginsburg, Breyer & Sotomayor, concurring; BREYER & Scalia (as to Part II), concurring)   

BilskiUSSCt06282010

MAJOR ISSUES: Business method patents; “process” in Section 101; exceptions for abstract ideas, natural phenomena, and laws of nature Read CPLRG™ 0015

Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior Univ. v. Roche Molecular Sys. - CPLRG™ 0070 - Jun. 6, 2011

Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior Univ. v. Roche Molecular Sys., 131 S. Ct. 2188 (June 6, 2011) (ROBERTS, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Alito & Kagan; SOTOMAYOR, concurring; BREYER & Ginsburg, dissenting) StanfordUniversityv.RocheMolecular06062011

MAJOR ISSUES: ownership of inventions and patent rights; initial ownership vesting in inventor; employee inventions; federally-funded inventions; universities as federal contractors

“Since 1790, the patent law has operated on the premise that rights in an invention belong to the inventor.” Read CPLRG™ 0070

Currently Browsing CPLRG™ by: Case Name
Browse By: Case Date | Case Number

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. ...
  10. 17

©2010 Donald S. Chisum - All Rights Reserved

Website design by Bluegrass Internet Services