Currently Browsing: CPLRG Guides

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. 8
  10. 9
  11. 10
  12. ...
  13. 17

CPLRG™ 0058 - Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co. - Apr. 26, 2010

Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co., 374 Fed. Appx. 35, CPLRG 0058 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (En Banc). TherasenseEnBancOrder

MAJOR ISSUES: inequitable conduct; unenforceability of patents; fraud. Read CPLRG™ 0058

CPLRG™ 0056 - Medtronic Navigation, Inc. v. BrainLAB Medizinische Computersysteme GMBH - Apr. 26, 2010

Medtronic Navigation, Inc. v. BrainLAB Medizinische Computersysteme GMBH, 603 F.3d 943, CPLRG0056 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (BRYSON & Newman; LOURIE, concurring)Medtronic04262010

MAJOR ISSUES:  attorney fee award to prevailing accused infringer;  ”exceptional case” determination under 35 U.S.C. § 285; continuing infringement suit after adverse claim construction ruling; theory on doctrine of equivalents and prosecution history estoppel; denial of summary judgment; litigation misconduct; arguments to jury allegedly undermining court’s claim construction Read CPLRG™ 0056

CPLRG™ 0055 - ClearPlay, Inc. v. Abecassis - Apr. 21, 2010

ClearPlay, Inc. v. Abecassis, 602 F.3d 1364, CPLRG 0055 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (BRYSON, Archer & Prost) Clearplay04212010

MAJOR ISSUES: Federal Circuit appellate jurisdiction; case not arising under patent law; state law claims arising from dispute over license agreement in settlement of patent infringement suit; claims provable without necessarily resolving patent law issues Read CPLRG™ 0055

CPLRG™ 0054 - Gillig v. Nike, Inc. - Apr. 20, 2010

Gillig v. Nike, Inc., 602 F.3d 1354 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (DYK, Linn & Plager)GilligNike04202010

MAJOR ISSUES:  inventorship correction suit; no res judicata effect of dismissal of prior trade secret suit for lack of standing; correction of pending applications Read CPLRG™ 0054

CPLRG™ 0052 - Verizon Services Corp. v. Cox Fibernet Virginia, Inc. - Apr. 16, 2010

Verizon Services Corp. v. Cox Fibernet Virginia, Inc., 602 F.3d 1325 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (LINN, Mayer & Prost)Verizon04162010

MAJOR ISSUES:  arguments to jury bearing on claim construction; anticipation; single reference rule; incorporation by reference; obviousness; relevant field of art; hostile testimony by named inventors Read CPLRG™ 0052

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. 8
  10. 9
  11. 10
  12. ...
  13. 17